高级检索
王秀丽, 吴纬芳. 词汇精细加工比复述加工更有效吗?—精细加工与复述加工对比研究元分析[J]. 安徽工业大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 41(2): 43-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9247.2024.02.010
引用本文: 王秀丽, 吴纬芳. 词汇精细加工比复述加工更有效吗?—精细加工与复述加工对比研究元分析[J]. 安徽工业大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 41(2): 43-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9247.2024.02.010
WANG Xiuli, WU Weifang. Is Vocabulary Elaboration More Effective than Repeated Processing?-Meta analysis of Comparative Study on Elaborative Processing and Repetition Processing[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology(Social Sciences), 2024, 41(2): 43-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9247.2024.02.010
Citation: WANG Xiuli, WU Weifang. Is Vocabulary Elaboration More Effective than Repeated Processing?-Meta analysis of Comparative Study on Elaborative Processing and Repetition Processing[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology(Social Sciences), 2024, 41(2): 43-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9247.2024.02.010

词汇精细加工比复述加工更有效吗?精细加工与复述加工对比研究元分析

Is Vocabulary Elaboration More Effective than Repeated Processing?Meta analysis of Comparative Study on Elaborative Processing and Repetition Processing

  • 摘要: 为了解不同词汇刻意学习活动的有效性,采用CMA3.0对26篇国内外词汇精细加工和复述加工对比研究进行了荟萃分析。研究发现:与复述加工相比,精细加工活动在词汇习得和保持方面更有效,即时效应为0.355,延迟效应为0.540;但亚组分析显示,仅提取练习和运用练习比复述加工更有效,而关键词、语义猜测、语义联想活动优势不明显。词汇测试类型、学习者二语水平会调节精细加工活动的习得效果。精细加工活动在词形测试中优势显著,在词义测试中优势不明显;精细加工更有利于低水平学习者词汇学习,对较高水平学习者影响不明显。不同文化背景也会在一定程度上影响精细加工效应,但影响不显著。

     

    Abstract: To investigate the effectiveness of different activities in intentional vocabulary learning, a meta-analysis by CMA3.0 was conducted on 26 studies comparing elaborate processing activities and repetition processing activities. The results showed that compared to repetition processing activities, elaborate processing activities were more effective in vocabulary acquisition and retention, with immediate effect of 0.355 and delayed retention effect of 0.540. Subgroup analysis revealed that only retrieval practice and vocabulary use were more effective than repetition, while keyword method, semantic inferencing, and semantic association had no significant advantage. Vocabulary test format and learner’s second language proficiency level moderated the effectiveness of elaborate processing activities. Elaborate processing activities had significant effects on form tests rather than on meaning tests; and it was more beneficial for low-level learners compared to higher-level learners. Different cultural traditions also influenced the effectiveness of fine processing to certain extent, but the influence was not significant.

     

/

返回文章
返回